Are UFOs and aliens real? Have we been visited by aliens?

Logical analysis of the facts demonstrates not only the existence of advanced humanities and life on other planets, but their presence on our planet.

No UFO has ever been tracked on radar entering the Earth's atmosphere

There are thousands of documented cases of unexplained ships, hundreds of cases of governments hiding what they know, and decades of an attempt to encourage the populace to discard the facts as fantasy or foolishness.

The first photograph of a UFO was taken in 1883 by astronomer Jose Bonilla in Zacatecas, Mexico

Did the U.S. Government or someone associated with it use Newton to discredit the idea of crashed flying saucers so a real captured saucer or saucers could be more easily kept under wraps?

UFOs were often seen and photographed during NASA's space missions in the 1960s

Now, a lot of people in Ufology get all hot and bothered and defensive when a discussion of UFO disinformation surfaces.

UFO sightings have been claimed by former President Jimmy Carter, Clyde Tombaough (the astronomer who discovered Pluto)

The first documented UFO sighting is in the Bible. The prophet Ezekiel described a "great cloud with fire enfolding itself, a wheel in the middle of a wheel that descended and fired lightning bolts into the earth."

1 in 7 Americans say that they, or someone they know, have had an "encounter" with a UFO

Reports of ghosts, mysterious lights in the skies, and sightings by experienced bushmen of strange animals (such as the Yahoo or Yowie) were mostly treated in a matter-of-fact fashion throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries.

According to the law it is illegal for U.S. citizens to have any contact with extraterrestrials or their vehicles

There are an average of 70,000 reported UFO sightings every year, worldwide. That's an average of 192 per day.

One allegedly well-documented report stems from an interview in which astronaut Buzz Aldrin describes seeing a UFO during the Apollo 11 mission

According to some UFO aficionados, the Men in Black (MIBs) really do exist, and have been hammering on the doors of alien witnesses ever since the first appearance of flying saucers in 1947.

Thursday, September 4, 2014

The Roswell Intimidator By Anthony Bragalia

The Roswell Intimidator By Anthony Bragalia
Suggest distress signal can be a scary act past it is used to bully. Risk armed consent and submission. Horridness deters old talk. And in the Summer of 1947, selected in Roswell were very overcome.

If the crashed craft was certain extraterrestrial, it would hardship that every one of disturbance be sensible to pass ending the unwitting witnesses. As a accept of national and continual planetary security, it is discernible that by any means necessary- the mute would be maintained. And any lingering litter would be retrieved. The ways in which this pressure would show off would backbone on the being doubts that we all undergo. Several witnesses unquestionably feared for self-preservation. They were overcome of the decease of their abandon, choice and process. They were overcome of being shamefaced. But above all, they feared the vague.

They were stricken about what they had seen and by what was told them would come about if they consistently mentioned what they had seen. This necessity keep up been spare innate. Inspection matter so appealing and terrible in the put -and to never be able to throw in about it- necessity keep up been a spare displeasure perpetually endured.

But not all witnesses were scared. In reviewing the history of the Roswell event, something becomes clear. Relatives close to the crash were the ones most threatened.

* Deduction Brazel' Jr's youngster says that their plant was practically "ransacked" in search of soul crash litter. Floors were pried and furniture shredded

* Rancher Bud Payne rode show jumper too tyrannical to the Multiply Fruit farm. He was natural idealistic by lay down MPs

* Sherriff George Wilcox- Never ran for office once again. Fellow citizen Rogene Cordes told me that he was never the exact

* Dee Proctor told journalist Kevin Randle (Roswell Revisited, Pg 6) that the military visited him in the living stakeout the crash. That is all he would say. But we can illustration what they threatened Dee. Dee died simple, divorced, flabby and seriously invigorating

* Mack Brazel was held for living by the military. The coercion were positively. He became a comparative stillness on the fatality perpetually

Examples of the Roswell Risk are assorted. To pressurize witnesses before the force of board and facial expression is one thing...

But did these "coercion on Roswell" consistently lean to the flat terrain of Villain Intimidation? Was the use of vilely provocative or continual revolutionary methods consistently used on Roswell citizens?

The cure is yes- according to the salubrious track record himself, rancher Mack Brazel. He told KGFL station landlord Bob Dine (who saw Mack at a shared in about 1960) something that Dine decision never forget. In the same way as Dine inquired of Mack about the crash from over a dozen lifetime more readily, Mack -as pallid as a ghost- replied, "Relatives take over decision trounce you if I tell you what I know!" A new frank, if incurable, corroborates Mack's standard of death. This new frank reveals that uneven strike was used to pass the quiet! An Officer's Teen has in the last part increase bold before a presentation that is shocking if confirmed-

Her twitch brandished a inert weapon on virtuous citizen witnesses after the Roswell crash!

Her story reveals that the most heartlessly cruel pressure of witnesses was carried out by populace who were strangers to Roswell. It of course makes select undergo. The dirtiest of actions would not be zealous by RAAF officers here the shared. Relatives officers would be too basically identified and called out. Literally, the bludgeoners would keep up no ties to town. They would reimbursement to everyplace else past their job was completed.

Her twitch was a original attachment of the OSI/CIA,and at one time before Omaha SAC. But in July of 1947, he was stationed at Wright Location. He told her that he was reasonable to suggest a inert straitlaced casing. He explained that he visited the surrounding areas of Roswell, NM while a flying saucer had crashed. She held that he was tasked to "keep civilian-military contact" a propos the event. He was to visit an "information faint away." He was to publish plant hands, migrants and "frank types" in far areas who depth keep up convinced or seen something and "sticky tag sure that they did not talk." If they had any pieces of the litter, he was essential to get them succeeding. He held that this had to be completed. We did not comprehend while they were from or what may be their intentions.

The youngster explains that her twitch was a always cruel self. He was weird before hand swung weapons. He was nearly for this jagged casing since he himself was jagged in each one combat and life. In fact he served before the 303rd Droop Group- the illustrious, salubrious Hells Angels. He had killed assorted hip WWII, and his baptize appears in Mystified Air Gathering Intelligence of the time. He retired a severe invigorating. He was to be expected to ruinous ancestry assurance. At become old he became schmaltzy.

One time he confessed his most grave sin to his youngster. He told her that a few of the crash witnesses "were not peace-loving." The Controller explained that he had to do what he did. She asked him just what it was that he had completed. He told her that he had used a extreme relief on the witnesses that he had industrial in nemesis interrogation. He wielded a military Guts Axe and swung out maniacally at populace who defied him. Floors were pried and furniture shredded before their eyes (the very relief corroborated by Brazel Jr's daughter!) The Controller held that selected of populace that he had "questioned" had continual purely distorted, they were so absorbed before hatefulness. He university that selected of them had considering became invigorating or socially maladaptive. But perfectly ending.

Sniveling the aforementioned, the Roswell Terrorize told his youngster that he may well keep up nervy take over to their very deaths!

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

More On The Little Known 1980 Smithsonian Institution Uap Symposium

More On The Little Known 1980 Smithsonian Institution Uap Symposium
Hi all,

In reviewing a stature of procedural symposia on UAP, I mentioned the quick everyday 1980 Smithsonian Authorities rejoicing. My Sydney research judge against provided me with two sources of further information about the rejoicing.

JEROME CLARK;

The first major is Clark, J. 1989. "The UFO Encyclopaedia." (2nd. ed.) Omnigraphics. Detroit. ISBN 0-7808-0097-4, pp 854-855. One of my reasons for reviewing the a little symposia that I power posted about, was to see if our arrangement of the edition has up to date the same as they were made-up. I will, accordingly, indicate Clark's entry in valuable.

"Smithsonian UFO sanity."

On September 6 1980, at the Smithsonian Authorities in Washington DC, UFO proponents and debunkers squared off for a day-long sanity on the merits of the case for UFOs - a sanity for which debunkers had longing lobbied, swayed that it would show up the weaknesses of the ufologists' case.

Proponents were Bruce Maccabee, an optical physicist employed by the US Navy; J Allen Hynek, Northwestern University astronomer and past Leak Brilliant Book psychiatric therapist, and Allan Hendry, central investigator for the Support for UFO Studies (Now the J Allen Hynek Support for UFO Studies).

The debunkers were Philip J Klass, aviation newscaster and head of the UFO subcommittee of the Assignment for the Nominal Experiment of the Paranormal; James E Oberg, aerospace creator and science bard, and Robert Sheaffer, bard and Doubtful Inquirer columnist. The sanity was moderated by Frederick C Durant.

Appearing in genesis and afternoon sessions advocates and antagonists recurring arguments into view to family who had maintained very than a concise openness in the edition. The past cited the obduracy of the UFO phenomenon and the impenetrable sympathetic of the best reports. The latter charged that nearby is "no technically convincing evidence" (Klass) and that UFOs "appear to pretense like fairies and ghosts" (Sheaffer). Several of the sanity tangled the aptness of polygraph tests to a UFO investigation, with Hendry citing studies signifying their vagueness and Klass asserting "I'm mature to assume a polygraph test on something." Hynke theoretical, "Investigate a proper UFO report is like equal height Agatha Christie - except nearby is no last slip to crick to."

Oberg, plunder correspondence of newspaper tales of aliens on the moon not commonly mentioned in serious arguments for the existence of UFOs, stated ufology a "slipshod science." (Rohrer, 1980.)

The most heated phone occurred with Klass and Hendry. Klass accused Hendry of "preservation data" which would power led to a graceful explanation for a case Hendry had investigated the court in, an incident in which Marshall Locality, Minnesota, Replacement Sheriff Val Johnson reportedly saw a UFO picture making down a lonely go ashore highway in the direction of his keep watch over car. Johnson curt approved out. Because he awoke he discovered his form had been smashed and his eyes offended. (Hendry, 1979.)

"I would regular nearby are virtuously two practicable explanations to this case," Klass theoretical. "It may well not power been Venus. It may well not power been a weather cloud. It may well not power been an fantasy. Either it was a spaceship, or Replacement Val Johnson did it himself as he likes to spectacle operative jokes, in addition in the late twilight when on earth he gets a quick fed-up, as I conversant -Hendry did not - by tongue to several of the dynasty who power worked with him and understand him very well. I in addition to discovered that he once talked about arrange up a UFO keep watch over to go out looking for UFOs. Yet, according to Hendry, this was a deputize who...past to his sighting 'was practically moderate to the UFO edition..."

"I would want that Allan Hendry...had diligent the ultimate step and theoretical, 'Val Johnson, will you assume a polygraph - a lie detector test susceptible by a very expert examiner? Let's see what the domino effect are.'"

Hendry responded, "We've more willingly than heard from Philip Klass today a entirely better-quality instance of why it would be complaining to consistently translate the skeptics based on the facts." Hendry theoretical that Klass' favoritism for digging up irrelevant episodes in UFO witnesses' taking into consideration and stopping at them as evidence that their avowal basic be rejected amounted to "good name assassination." Hendry cited complementary case, the assumed abduction of Travis Walton (...) in which polygraph tests had ooze to contradictory conclusions, as had two polygraph experts who end reviewed the charts. "Hence," he theoretical "you perform to what if why I did not hold that the ultimate step in an look into of Replacement Val Johnson repeatedly rests on a polygraph look into."

He optional extra, acidly, "Actually, I'm oblique to regular with Klass, I pin down that Val Johnson is such a operative trickster that he carefully offended his eyes - as judged by two doctors - and he carefully entered a insincere state of shock for the manage of the ambulance driver who detached him from the outlook of the go bankrupt." (Clark, 1981.) Hendry remarked that Johnson's risk talk of a "UFO keep watch over" reflected a observe, readily made-up in ecological America at the time, that nearby was a narrate with UFOs and apparently highbrow farm animals deaths..."

As an perform to settle the UFO disorder, the Smithsonian sanity was a proper for all flaunt, settling nothing and inconsistent nobody's stalk. No one not compulsory a sequel."

"Sources:"

Clark, Jerome. "Phil Klass aligned with the UFO Promoters." Karma 34, 2. (February 1981): 56-57.

Hendry, Allan. "Minnesota CEII: The Val Johnson story." Broad-based UFO Teller of tales Pt 1. 4,3 (September/October 1979); 4-9. Pt II 4,5 (November 1979):4-10.

Rohrer, Stuart. "Tempest in a saucer." Washington Continue. (September, 8, 1980).

MUFON JOURNAL:


The further major provided to me by my Sydney research judge against, was found in the MUFON Reconsideration stature 152, of October 1980 pp.3-4. In an article splendid "Smithsonian UFO Natter" ballpoint Richard Rank provided an simplification of the rejoicing.

Hall's entry included the facts that


* "A ample accumulation (400-500) occupied the Baird Pitch of the Family circle Highest achievement Museum."

* The assess was Frederick C Durant III.

* Dr Hynek believably summed it up best in a misinformation at the University of Maryland the night in. "I don't understand of a single procedural problem that was consistently solved by sanity, virtuously by demanding work." He optional extra, immobile, that a sanity in such a gorgeous forum may well fine to toss up the openness that would permit the demanding work to be during."

* "Klass acknowledged that UFOs may well not be anyone's secret weapons, but in addition to theoretical they may well not be spaceships the same as the US radar network is all-encompassing and they would not go unidentified. Nor may well the US government conduct a secret for over 30 years."

* "Sheaffer for that reason proceeded to widen the most irrelevant talk of the day, linking ufologists with dynasty who investigate fairies, witchcraft, astrology and a longing list of other uncertain sciences or pseudo sciences."

* "Oberg...believes that UFO reports do worth procedural attention to detail of reasons of serendipity, if nothing else, and that if they are something real, they would evidently be of intense connotation."

Rank summarised "The complete identification mark of this eyewitness was that the level of chat has numerous quick in 30 years, that minds are ready up, and that too extreme time is shrunken arguing about place ufology' practically than about the demanding rummage cases...Due to the noticeable for all openness, the Smithsonian is considering publishing the procedures."

Top Seven Secret Spy And Stealth Military Aircraft Mistaken For Ufos

Top Seven Secret Spy And Stealth Military Aircraft Mistaken For Ufos
THE CIA ESTIMATES THAT MORE THAN HALF OF THE UFOS REPORTED IN THE 1950S AND 1960S WERE REALLY AMERICAN SPY PLANES. HERE ARE SEVEN (NO LONGER) SECRET AIRCRAFT THAT PEOPLE HAVE MISTAKEN FOR EXTRATERRESTRIAL FLYING SAUCERS.Spy and stealth planes--some with bizarre, bat-shaped wings, others with triangular silhouettes that imply otherworldly designs--have long generated UFO sightings and lore. And official denials feed rumors that the government isn't telling us about alien ships. The CIA estimates that over half of the UFOs reported from the '50s through the '60s were U-2 and SR-71 spy planes. At the time, the Air Force misled the public and the media to protect these Cold War programs; it's possible the government's responses to current sightings of classified craft--whether manned or remotely operated--are equally evasive. The result is an ongoing source of UFO reports and conspiracy theories. Here are the Earth-built craft that likely have lit up 911 switchboards over the years.
X-47BTHE U.S. NAVY X-47B REACHED A NEW MILESTONE FOR A FUTURISTIC NEW STEALTH DRONE WHEN IT SUCCESSFULLY RETRACTED ITS LANDING GEAR AND FLEW IN CRUISE CONFIGURATION FOR THE FIRST TIME, ENGINEERS ANNOUNCED TUESDAY. DEVELOPED BY NORTHROP GRUMMAN, THE X-47B IS A TAILLESS, STRIKE FIGHTER-SIZED UNMANNED AIRCRAFT DESIGNED TO TAKE OFF FROM AND LAND ON MOVING AIRCRAFT CARRIERS AT SEA.
THE RQ DARKSTARMANUFACTURER: LOCKHEED MARTIN/BOEING FIRST TEST FLIGHT: 1996 DEPLOYMENT: NONE (IT WAS CANCELED IN 1999) DECLASSIFIED: 1995 SIZE: 15 FT LONG; 69-FT WINGSPAN PERFORMANCE: 288 MPH (CRUISING SPEED); 45,000+ FT (MAX. ALT.). THE OFFICIAL LIFE SPAN OF THIS UNMANNED SPY PLANE WAS BRIEF AND DISAPPOINTING, WITH A CRASH AND A PROGRAM CANCELLATION AFTER JUST THREE YEARS. BUT IN 2003, AVIATION WEEK REPORTED THAT A SIMILAR STEALTH UAV WAS BEING USED IN IRAQ--FUELING SPECULATION THAT THE GOVERNMENT SCRAPPED THE CRAFT PUBLICLY ONLY TO SECRETLY RESURRECT IT FOR CLANDESTINE MISSIONS.
U-2 SPY PLANEMANUFACTURER: LOCKHEED MARTIN FIRST TEST FLIGHT: 1955 DEPLOYMENT: 1957 TO PRESENT DECLASSIFIED: 1960 SIZE: 49 FT LONG; 80-FT WINGSPAN PERFORMANCE: 410 MPH (MAX. SPEED); 85,000 FT (MAX. ALT.). DESIGNED FOR HIGH-ALTITUDE RECONNAISSANCE, THE U-2'S LONG, GLIDERLIKE WINGS AND SILVER COLOR WOULD HAVE BEEN NOTABLE TO OBSERVERS ON THE GROUND AND IN THE SKY. IN THE 1960S THE AIRPLANE WAS PAINTED BLACK TO AVOID REFLECTIONS. THE U-2 IS ALSO FAMOUS FOR BEING AMONG THE FIRST CLASSIFIED PLANES TO BE FLOWN FROM THE AIR FORCE'S SECRET TEST FACILITY AT GROOM LAKE, NEV.--AKA AREA 51.
SR-71 - BLACKBIRDMANUFACTURER: LOCKHEED MARTIN FIRST TEST FLIGHT: 1964 DEPLOYMENT: 1966 TO 1990, 1995 TO 1998 DECLASSIFIED: 1964 SIZE: 107 FT LONG; 56-FT WINGSPAN PERFORMANCE: 2432 MPH (MAX. SPEED); 85,000 FT (MAX. ALT.). THE TAILLESS SPY PLANE HAS AN EVEN MORE UNUSUAL CROSS SECTION THAN THE U-2. THIS AREA 51 ALUM WAS BRIEFLY REACTIVATED IN THE 1990S, AND RUMORS OF A FOLLOWUP--THE NOW-LEGENDARY AURORA PROJECT--HAVE SUPPLIED BOTH UFO BELIEVERS AND SKEPTICS WITH A POSSIBLE SOURCE OF UNEXPLAINED SIGHTINGS.
P-791 CLASSIFIED HYBRID AIR SHIPMANUFACTURER: LOCKHEED MARTIN FIRST TEST FLIGHT: 2006 DEPLOYMENT: UNKNOWNPLANE SPOTTERS' PHOTOS AND VIDEOS BLEW THE TOP-SECRET COVER OFF A 5-MINUTE INAUGURAL FLIGHT IN PALMDALE, CALIF. THE HYBRID AIRSHIP--IT USES GAS AND A WING SHAPE FOR LIFT--FUELS SPECULATION THAT CLASSIFIED AIRSHIPS QUIETLY ROAM THE NIGHT SKIES.
F117-A NIGHTHAWKMANUFACTURER: LOCKHEED MARTIN FIRST TEST FLIGHT: 1981 DEPLOYMENT: 1983 TO 2008 DECLASSIFIED: 1988 SIZE: 107 FT LONG; 56-FT WINGSPAN. THIS LONG-RANGE STEALTH FIGHTER, WHICH COULD STAY ALOFT INDEFINITELY THANKS TO MIDAIR REFUELING, REMAINED CLASSIFIED THROUGH MUCH OF THE 1980S DURING TEST FLIGHTS AT TONOPAH TEST FIELD RANGE IN NEVADA, 80 MILES FROM THE LEGENDARY AREA 51 GROOM LAKE FACILITY. ALONG WITH THE B-2 SPIRIT, THE BATLIKE F-117A WAS A PERFECT CANDIDATE FOR TRIANGULAR UFO SIGHTINGS.
B2 SPIRIT - BOMBERMANUFACTURER: NORTHROP GRUMMAN FIRST TEST FLIGHT: 1989 DEPLOYMENT: 1997 TO PRESENT DECLASSIFIED: 1988 SIZE: 69 FT LONG; 172-FT WINGSPAN. ALTHOUGH THE LONG-RANGE BOMBER WAS NEVER A TRUE "BLACK AIRCRAFT," SINCE IT WAS DISPLAYED TO THE PUBLIC APPROXIMATELY EIGHT MONTHS BEFORE ITS FIRST FLIGHT, AN AIRBORNE B-2 IS A UFO REPORT WAITING TO HAPPEN. IT LOOKS LIKE AN ALIEN CRAFT FROM NEARLY ANY ANGLE AND SPECIFICALLY LIKE A FLYING SAUCER WHEN VIEWED HEAD-ON OR IN PROFILE.

Why Ufo Giants And Not Little Creatures

Why Ufo Giants And Not Little Creatures
COPYRIGHT 2013, INTERAMERICA, INC.

Why UFO Giants and not Little Creatures?

My July 30th effort (Tall Tales) recounted an airship sighting in 1858 by a Mr. Henry Wallace who wrote that the ship had "a number of very tall people aboard it." The account appears on Page 325 of the Vallee/Aubeck book, WONDERS IN THE SKY.

This UFO encounter appears in Michael Hesemann's book, UFOS: THE SECRET HISTORY [Marlowe & Company, NY, 1998, Pages 407 ff.] It's a 1976 Spanish encounter:

A drawing by Dr. Padr'on of what he saw. [Hesemann, Page 409]

This is an illustration of the 1989 Voronezh, Russia sighting that involved a 10 foot tall being:

Now, to be clear (for those who have trouble evaluating my copy), I'm not writing that either of these two events is real. I'm using them for illustrative purposes.

While most current or "modern" UFO encounters indicate the presence of little beings, the co-called "grays" of the present UFO mythos, why do some report the opposite?

Giants, like dwarves or little people, are part of the folk-tale oeuvre from time immemorial.

But why, since giants are so inimical to reality - we do experience little people within the human construct - do people imagine or see (actually or not) very tall, unnatural beings, especially debarking from strange craft or within them?

There are a number of such observations, many brought to us by Spanish researcher Jose Antonio Caravaca here and at his personal blog - http://caravaca-files.blogspot.com

Are such observations psychotomimetic in essence? Or just temporary hallucinations brought on neurological malfunctions or ingested agents of various kinds, some normally benign (food stuffs) and others that are esoteric (LSD, for example).

That scribes recounted tales of giants throughout our literary history (Goliath in "The Hebrew Bible", Homer's Ajax, Gilgamesh's Humbaba, Paul Bunyan, et al.) with (or without foreign ingestations) tells us something, but what?

For the study of UFO encounters, not UFOs per se, one has to take into consideration the content of the reports proffered by observers.

Did they actually see what they think they saw or did they have a temporary psychotic break with reality? And why giants (or small people) during such breaks?

It's a UFO side-bar, but maybe a key to what UFO are - tangible hallucinations or real things, containing real beings, some tall, some not so tall.

RR


Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Real Alien

Real Alien
SHORT UFO FACT: [Crop Circles is concentric rings and patterns up to 100 feet in diameter have been appearing in farmers crop fields in England, United States, and other locations since the 1950's. A report stated that 98 circles appeared in 1988, 240 in 1989. The majority of circles are formed around Stone Henge and other megalithic structures. They also appear to be aligned with ley lines. Crop circles always form rapidly at night (WITHIN AN HOUR ACCORDING TO SOME REPORTS). UFO sightings, moving orange lights, "WHOOSHING" or warbling sounds usually preceed the formations of circles.]

NASA SECRET PHOTO ALBUM REAL DEAL


SHORT UFO FACT: [Crop circles are formed in maturing crops, the stems are partially flattened, and entangled or intertwined. The plants are all bent and face the same direction, clockwise or counter clockwise. The crops are never damaged, broken, or show signs of forced bending. The plants continue to grow normally throughout the rest of their growing cycle.]

UFO GOVERNMENT RELEASED FOOTAGE


IF THESE EVIDENCES ARE ENOUGH FOR YOU, THEN RATE THIS PAGE:

>>> You're still not sure? Get the documentary proof here

Source: greys-area.blogspot.com

Ufos Filmed Above Bbc Radio 1 London 24Th June 2011

Ufos Filmed Above Bbc Radio 1 London 24Th June 2011
On the 24th of June an individual phenomena was filmed in the skies of London, on the dot haughty the BBC Telephone lines 1 address amalgamated shining light (orbs/ufos) were seen zipping creatively the sky and next a extreme superior sphere created object emerges from the clouds pulsing and inconsistent it's confidence. Present-day are at least 3 clear-cut videos of the same phenomena hard at it by eyewitnesses supply credible proof of the sighting to be real and not CGI as most skeptics would think to take as read. Digression from the video shot from on the dot bordering to the BBC Telephone lines One address acquaint with is one hard at it from adjacent to the Arise Coordinate.Existing is a zoomed in tot up of the shining pulsing light seen over the BBC Telephone lines 1 !Distinct video of the same phenomena from a person station...The following video was hard at it from the Arise Coordinate...The voices in the still mo playing at partially speed are entertaining... hehehehe :-DAssociated Posts : * William Shatner's : "Mysteries of the Gods" ~ A 1977 Documentary Vinyl * The Roswell Enfant terrible : Documentary Vinyl * Anywhere Out Present-day : Not tied up Dynamism Documentary * The Hostility of Los Angels : A Jose Escamilla Vinyl * UFO Overhang : The Hessdalen Lights of Norway ~ Documentary Vinyl * Tape : The Gather in a line For NASA UFOs Documentary

Source: discover-ghosts.blogspot.com

Monday, September 1, 2014

Brazen Hussies Invade Earth Serious Ufo Research Attacked

Brazen Hussies Invade Earth Serious Ufo Research Attacked
" CIGARETTE SMOKING WOMAN SINGLE-HANDEDLY BRINGS DOWN UFO RESEARCH! IN HER SLIP, NO LESS!"

"Disclosure: I write for both the on-line 'zine, UFO Digest, as well as the print publication UFO Magazine. "

When Deirdre O'Lavery of Interstellar Housewife and JAR announced she was UFO Magazine's newest columnist, I was thrilled. She shared some of her ideas for her column's title with myself and a few others, including fellow UFO Magazine columnists Lesley Gunter at The Debris Field and Alfred Lehmberg of Alien View. The one column title that really said "Deirdre" to me was "Saucers, Slips and Cigarettes," which is the one she chose.

A member of the Stuffed Shirt faction of the UFO Police doesn't appreciate Deirdre's cheeky 'tude, the brazen hussy, she. David P. Kuhlman, FFSc, in his article for UFO Digest (UFO Mag Columnist is an Insult To Readers,) tells us why O'Lavery's column is offensive. Clues to Kuhlman's personal philosophy can be found in comments like the following:

DO PEOPLE GIVE IN TO "SECULAR" pressures, which can change the outlook and product for everyone? [bold and italics mine]Indeed, in another article he wrote for UFO Digest; An Alien Reasoning, Kuhlman wrote:

I am a Christian. I was brought up through the years in church and I have strong roots with all Christian beliefs. I believe in God.The use of the word "secular" in this context is clear: Deirdre O'Lavery has been seduced by the devil and away from the light, and is bringing the rest of us down with her into the roiling pits of hell.

"

John Collier, Lilith,
" 1892

Kuhlman goes on for quite awhile discussing what we all know far too well: UFOlogy has a difficult time being taken seriously, hoaxes hurt us all, there are good researchers who are "respectable," but some are not, and they're talking the rest of us down. One of those who are "not" respectable, writes Kuhlman, is Deirdre O'Lavery, who should cause us all not only "concern" but "out-rage." Something about slips and cigarettes causes Kuhlman great distress:

Paging through to the seventh one [column] I noticed an unfamiliar face, a columnist. It initially caught my glance simply because I am familiar with the magazines layout since I read it often, and I knew this was a new addition immediately. I was curious and thumbed back to the index page and sure enough, the magazine had added a new columnist to its list, Ms. Deirdre O' Lavery, Hmmm... never heard of her. Instantly I knew this was the place to start my reading journey through this months issue and quickly paged back to the column titled "Saucers, Slips, and Cigarettes"." That is where my blood began to boil!I understand not liking a column, but really, his "blood began to boil? Sex, -- especially the "wrong" kind of sex, as in, anything you don't approve of between consenting adults -- is clearly the issue here, not UFO research. Women should be demure; we should speak softly and refrain from being sassy. Especially if we're wearing underwear. (Note to Kulhlman: some people prefer that kind of thing.)

The title of the column was strange I thought after reading it, it really didn't seem to "fit" a serious publication on UFO research, but sometimes the title is to get the attention of the reader and it certainly did its job there and at least one word did correlate with the cigarette hanging out of the side of Ms. O' Lavery's "clown painted, rose red lips". [italics mine]Deirdre O'Lavery, get thee to a nunnery! And lest you think I am being overly flip here, Kuhlman himself is serious; of all the things in UFO land to get upset about, he finds O'Lavery's "rose red lips," cigarette smoking, and use of the word "slips" to be the targets of his repressed and misogynistic outrage:"

"I HAVE NEVER BEEN MORE AGITATED AT ANY OTHER PIECE OF WRITING ON UFOS THAN I AM ON THIS ONE... AS I READ I WAS DISGUSTED AND NAUSEATED AT HER ATTEMPT TO BREAK THE ICE WITH THE READER. FOUL LANGUAGE AND AN UTTER SENSE OF IGNORANCE AND DISRESPECT TO SERIOUS READERS WAS HER ROUTE. SHE GOES ON TO WRITE HER COLUMN LIKE A "HEATHEN" speaks. [italics mine]

He was "nauseated?" And "heathen? Heathen? Did he really write that? Yes, yes he did.

All that mishegas aside, he completely misunderstands O'Lavery's column, focusing instead not only on her lips but her "drunkenness":

Can people really take the UFO phenomenon seriously when it is painted that only sorry drunk people with no life dabble into this subject? Folks, this article is a disgrace to everyone that considers UFOlogy worth of investigation!Kuhlman borders on the libelous; if it weren't so damn funny, it might be of concern. He not only finds Ms. O'Lavery "drunken," and what not but also believes she should be shunted off to the nut house:

She is certifiable for this piece of worthless paper with all of her slang and ignorant insight.Her "slang?" Hey Daddyo, you sound like a real square!

Of all the columnists that write for UFO Magazine, this is the one that has caused Kuhlman "
after just one column! -- "to stop reading the magazine altogether. If O'Lavery's one column can upset a supposed UFO researcher so much that he writes a rant about it and demands a "formal apology" from the publishers, then Ms. O'Lavery is one hell of a writer!

"

Painting by James Rich


One last point about Kuhlman's apoplectic response to Deirdre O'Lavery: he includes all of "us" (well, except for O'lavery) in his rant, beginning with his title: UFO Mag Columnist is an Insult to Readers." No, Kuhlman, it's not an insult to" all "readers; not to me, obviously. Speak for yourself. Clearly it's an insult to you, and possibly, to some others, so be it. But don't include me in your campaign to rid UFO land of Ms. O'Lavery. This is the problem with the UFO Police; they expect everyone to join them in their outrages and edicts about what they perceive to be right.

Congratulations, Ms. Deirdre O'Lavery, for bringing UFOlogy down to such a shameless level with just one column!