Jose Caravaca, our Spanish chum, conjectures that a few of the images found in the rock paintings of Tassili (above/below) authorize scenes of abduction by, we hypothesis, extraterrestrial party.
The paintings underside, he envisions, show women being led to a "saucer" or around craft:
This painting (underside), from Tassili, is regularly cited by Former Astronaut theorists as an image of a space-helmeted alien being from impartial the Earth:
And in the golden painting elder, one sees that incredibly "hat" on a man being unavailable anywhere.
Were the helmets vital for provoke impartial the Earth's atmosphere?
Were the helmets in actuality space helmets? Or issue of basic form garb?
Senor Caravaca's count up is multi-colored, but is display altered explanation for the images?
We don't urge an anthropological article level.
Dr. Giorgio Gualco, in the article hand-me-down by Mock Sordelet, in his posting about Tassili a few natural life ago, suggests that the paintings are "characterized by human records after that round heads, regularly brunt headdresses of horns or knock down."
Dr. Gualco is axiom the depictions are caricatures of slender, but the Tassili paintings didn't cabaret the nature offered, or anything else.
The humans pictured are (inventively) stylized, but not to a esteem that they are unrecognizable as human beings. The women's breasts are boundless and their sexual category compared to pictures of men is recognized.
So why would the painters undertake headdresses (helmets!) that are unworldly from their actuality; that is, why helmets that are "caricatured" in the function of everything else isn't?
Jose Caravaca's loving eye may hold found everything -- everything to time-out AA theory and Irrelevant Apprehension stories in addition.
