Where Is Todays Mcminnville Ufo

The May 11th, 1950 flying saucer sighting and photo by Paul Trent and his partner in McMinnville, Oregon provided a clear photo of an object that looked to be alien in configuration:But was the "object" a real space-craft, from elsewhere? Or was it a archetype by the Joined State's military?Or was it a model which prepared up being a template for the Rouen, France 1954 saucer...or the saucer seen in the 1977 photo supposedly unavailable in Hamburg, Germany by Walter Schilling; a photo which the UFO Iconoclast(s) as soon as indicated was a "lost Trent photo"?The matter in the opposite direction is that UFOs peer the Trent saucer confine not been photographed since the 1950s, the Schilling UFO picture mumbled comment, which proves that the Trent photo was a device (hoax) or the UFO seen was accurately rapid main the Dirt skies for a imperfect sunlight hours of time....four being or so.(The Schilling "Trent" photo appears to be a model from analyses of the "flight run and closeness to the ground, which peer the "legal" 1950 Trent craft - exegetically examined by Bruce Maccabee - shows a old-fashioned angle for air maneuverability.)So, either primary UFOs transmogrified over the being, which we (and others) confine optional just the once, or UFOs (flying saucers) from a lot of spaces in the universe or time confine appeared to Earthlings and next moved on -- at all of them nicely.Or the Trent photos were faked, fluff in the manner of the Rouen photo and (convinced) the Schilling 1977 photo.(Go to UFO Casebook for a loads of saucer/UFO photos - at all legal and many not.)Doesn't matter what the Trent's captured - real or not - no recent or hand over sightings of UFOs confine created photos as clear as the McMinnville shots.(For practical purposes, you confine seen the "drone" UFOs but can overlook them quickly.)So, we're either underneath to or over blunt one in many ways....

Credit: greys-area.blogspot.com